Kulbhushan Yadav (Jadhav) a RAW Agent - Indian Media PROVES!

Indian "keyboard warriors" are usually seen arguing that the terrorist spy of Raw (Kulbhushan Jadav) was innocent and that there is "insufficient evidence" against him.

Surprisingly India's own media has done reports on him, which *prove* beyond doubt that Jadav was indeed a Raw Agent living with a Fake Passport and a Fake name!


Let's analyse a few reports: 

1. The "Ahmedabad Mirror" - http://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/news/...w/51588961.cms

 

 

- Reported (from TOP Indian Intelligence Officials) that Jadav was indeed a spy who broke his COVER when he communicated with his family in Marathi:

"Kul Bhushan Jadhav was arrested by Pakistan's Intelligence Bureau as he had dropped his guard and started talking like a Marathi Manoos during his telephone conversations with his family, disclose senior officers from central intelligence..."

AND

"Top intelligence officers have revealed that after 14 years of working in the region he had become a bit complacent. It is suspected that his phone was on surveillance by the Pakistani agencies and those who were monitoring his communications "

Reported the Indian Paper

The same was reported by India.com as well here: http://www.india.com/news/india/raw-...ption-1063063/

2. Jadav's own friends and family ADMITTED he was a spy as per the Indian News papers!

The "Indian Express" made this startling revelation that Jadav had told some of his own friends he was going to work for RAW!

The news paper wrote ( http://indianexpress.com/article/ind...istan-4608185/) :

"To some friends in Mumbai, who spoke to this newspaper, Jadhav claimed he was setting up an independent business in Iran. To others, he claimed he was beginning work with RAW. "

What stronger evidence does one need than this? Jadav had even told some of his own friends he was going to work for RAW !

"The Ahmedabad Mirror," reported that his friends and family were even aware that he had been under surveillance by Pakistani authorities:

" Jadhav, who last visited Mumbai some four months back, was under watch by the Pakistani agencies during his movements in Iranian cities in the course of his work, his close friends from Mumbai police told this newspaper .."

And " The family had lost contact with Jadhav since February leading to the suspicion that he was in the custody of Pakistan for a while now. As a result, two other local contacts who were supposed to provide back-up assistance to Jadhav are also reportedly missing for over a month" (source:
http://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/news/...w/51588961.cms )
 

3. Jadav's colleagues in the Indian Navy too thought he was involved in 'espionage':

" His batchmates remember him as an elusive person, who never attended reunions and remained absent for long periods. To one, he dropped broad hints of being involved in government-linked activity." 

So to even his colleagues in the navy he dropped hints of being involved in govt-linked activities (referring to espionage) Source: http://indianexpress.com/article/ind...-know-4607393/

4.  Jadav's Fake Passport:

 

  

 Many common Indians and Indian anchors are seen arguing that since Jadav had an "Indian" passport therefore he could not have been a spy since India would not supposedly send a spy to Iran/ Balochistan with an Indian passport.

Firstly, as we have already seen that both Jadav's friends and family and top Indian Intelligence officials have already admitted that he indeed was a spy. Now let us move on to what the Indian media itself reported regarding his passport...

"The Economic Times" wrote

( http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/...w/58142186.cms) :

" According to reports, Jadhav has allegedly obtained a fake passport in the name of Hussein Mubarak Patel from Pune in November 2003.
Reports suggest that Jadhav was working in Iran under this fake name. "

So the Indian Media has already admitted that he not only got a passport with a fake name but also that he was working in Iran with a fake name!

Lets move on to what the "Indian Express" wrote regarding his passport:

"What is CLEAR is that in November 2003, Jadhav  then still an Indian Navy engineer, on the verge of retiring after 14 years of service  illegally obtained passport E6934766 in Pune, identifying him by the pseudonym Patel"

(http://indianexpress.com/article/ind...istan-4608185/)

So according to the Indian express it is CLEAR that Jadav had indeed an illegal Indian passport and that too with a Fake name, while he was still a serving officer!

So long story cut short; this Indian spy was trying to hide behind a Muslim name in Iran and Iran is more 'safer / easier to work' for Indian Muslims than for Pakistani one's.

Jadav was handling most of his operations at the Iran-Pakistan border (at Chahbar) and travelled to Balochistan and Karachi undetected when he had to meet other terrorists. 

5. Why was Jadav's family kept out of the scene for a long time? 

 

 

As reported by a part of the Indian Media, Jadav's family, initially did not reply to any of the questions being asked to them.

If Jadav was truly innocent why was his family not allowed to talk to the media? Its being suspected that they wanted the Indian Intelligence Officials to own him (just like families of other Indian spies spoke up when India disowned its own spies previously):

The "Times Of India" wrote
(http://m.timesofindia.com/city/mumba...w/51567767.cms) :

" The (Jadav's) family remained tight-lipped on Saturday though several media persons made attempts to get in touch with them. However, a local milk delivery boy, when shown a picture of Kulbhushan, immediately identified it and claimed he had seen him "in his flat just days before Holi".

6. Mr. Shirish Thorat, former Indian Police Officer and currently a New-York based security expert, accepted that it was part of the plan to disown Jadav (as an Indian spy) and also to pressurise the family to do the same!  

The Indian paper quoted him as follows:

"In Jadhav's case too, the agencies have launched an expeditious exercise to retrace his footsteps and shut down all of his possible ongoing operations. The first step is to disown Jadhav as their operative and also ask the family to disassociate with him." - (source: http://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/news/...w/51588961.cms )

So another Indian security expert, clearly stated that RAW was trying to clear all evidences linking up to Jadav !

7. India's ex-Raw chief (Amarjit Singh) and Mr. Bannergee ( Former secretary RAW ) statements on an Indian media channel:

Both of them said that Jadav could have been our (India's) spy. They also said that policy is to deny it publicly when the spy is caught.


The question arises:  

When do former spies say such things??

Imagine if India's "Top Spy Master" wanted to deny Jadav's espionage, he would have clearly said that 'Jadav couldn't be a spy at all'. 

But Mr. Amarjit wanted to 'play safe'. He wanted to tell his young soldiers that look I am not disowning him yet not clearly accepting that he was a spy (as that would be against India's national interests)

Here is the video:

Alternative link:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEQxHz8J4cY



 
SO the Indian Media itself *proved* beyond doubt that Jadav was indeed a RAW agent living with a fake name at the Iran-Pakistan border.


-Abdur Rahman

What Works Imran Khan Did ? (Without Being In Power)

In Adittion to above Imran Khan made 574 Houses in Thatta and Badin (these are special Environment Friendly Houses, called Earth Bags):

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10201052186047692&set=o.120834037976534&type=1&theater

Imran Khan also made 134 Houses in Baluchistan : https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=477429312317003&set=a.133548556705082.22286.120834037976534&type=1&theater

Visit This Site to see what more Imran Khan DID for Pakistan: https://www.facebook.com/IKfoundation?fref=ts

Muhammad (PBUH)

                                              

Thousands of years ago Moses (P) told the children of Israel, the promise of God Almighty; about raising a prophet who would be 'like Moses' (P); ‘I (God) will raise them up a prophet from among their brothers (the brothers of the children of Israel), like you (Moses); and I will put my words in his mouth, and he shall speak to them all that I shall command him. It shall happen that whoever will not listen to my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him. (The Bible Deuteronomy 18:18-19). However, in the law of Moses (the Torah) it was written: ‘So Moses the servant of the LORD died there in the land of Moab but no man knows of his tomb to this day here has not arisen a prophet since in Israel like Moses, (Deuteronomy 34:5,6,10). Thus long after the death of prophet Moses (P) ‘the prophet like Moses’ had not yet appeared. 

Hundreds of years later, the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask John the Baptist (Prophet Yahya, P) some questions: ‘Who are you?’ they said. He replied: ‘I am not the Christ.’ They asked him, ‘What then? Are you Elijah?’ He said, ‘I am not.’ ‘Are you That Prophet?’ He answered, ‘No.’ They asked him, ‘Why then do you baptize, if you are not the Christ, nor Elijah, nor That Prophet?’ (The Bible John1:19-21, 25). Thus the Jews were still waiting for three distinct personalities the Christ (i.e. the Messiah, Jesus P), Elijah (P), and THAT prophet. The Prophet like Moses, the prophet whom God had promised to raise had still not come! 

Jesus (P) told his followers 'I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. However when he, The Spirit of Truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth (John 16:12-13). And about 600 years after Jesus (P), in the desert of Arabia in Makkah, among the Ishmaelites (the Arabs, the brothers of the children of Israel) was born The Prophet, the prophet Muhammad (P). A prophet sent as a mercy to all mankind, a prophet who always spoke in the name of God and spoke what He commanded him to.   

The Makkans had always believed what Muhammad (P) had to say for his truthfulness was well known in Makkah. When Muhammad (P) started preaching the message of Islam, the message of worshipping one God alone without any partners, the Makkans were annoyed by this message; for the Idols and religious ceremonies were a great source of income for the Makkan leaders (many of them Muhammad’s own uncles). The influential and rich among them threatened him. But the Prophet replied ‘Even if you keep the sun on my right hand and the moon on my left, I will not give up preaching my message.’  

They made Muhammad (P) ‘a great offer!’ 
 Muhammad (P) would be made 'the chief or the king,' get the keys of the Ka'ba, be given lots of money or married in the most honourable tribe if he wished. Makkah would be under his command if he gave up his work. But the Prophet declined all these offers!

All power and authority was declined for God and for the love of His people, by Muhammad (P). The people for which he grieved and ardently wanted that they knew and accepted the truth. This shows Muhammad’s (P) commitment to his mission and his love for humanity in general. God had to tell him again and again not to grieve for the disbelieving folk: ‘You (O Muhammad) wouldst only, perchance torment yourself to death, following after them, in grief if they believe not in this Message (Quran18:6)’ - Grieving even to death for the people’s good! Such was Muhammad’s (P) greatness, which brings tears to the eyes of the believers.

The Muslims were oppressed and persecuted by the Arab disbelievers and so was the prophet. In Makkah insulting and hurting the prophet was an everyday event, ‘the nobles’ amongst the Quraish used to tell their slaves to do so. Once a lot of unbelievers gathered around him and started abusing and shouting loudly, this resulted in such jostling that the prophet had to take refuge at some place. Abu Lahab used to get animal refuse and filth put at the prophet’s door and his wife used to get thorns put in the way of the prophet. Dust and garbage was commonly thrown upon the prophet’s blessed head. The Makkans had decided that no Makkan would ever go or listen to the prophet. A person named Aqba listened to some of his words. Aqba’s friend rebuked him and asked him as to why he did not spit on the prophet’s face while he (Muhammad P) was talking. Aqba then spat on the Prophet’s (P) face. The prophet had to offer his prayers in secret in Makkah because the Makkans used to put animal intestines over him and also while food was being cooked at his house (source: Ibn Hisham Vol.2 p.280, 28, 233,277,238,276-277).

Once some unbelievers put a cloth around his neck and pulled it causing him (P) to suffocate and fall on the ground. The Prophet went to Taif to preach his message and there the people stoned him so much so that his shoes were filled with blood. He prayed forgiveness for them as 'they knew not.'

Muhammad and his followers were forced to live for 3 years in a valley. Suffering with hunger, eating the leaves of the trees, getting some food secretly they passed those years of hard-ship. Then the unbelievers decided that one man from every Arab tribe would go and kill Muhammad (P) but the prophet was saved by God’s help. All this was patiently endured by the merciful apostle of God and he never lost his trust in God, who had already told him “Verily the Later portion (of life) shall be better for thee than the First. Thy Lord shall give thee, and thou shall be satisfied. (Quran 93:4-5).” And how could one forget: “They were afflicted by misery and hardship and were so convulsed, that the Messenger and those who believed with him said, 'When comes God's help?' Ah, but surely God's help is nigh. (Quran 2:214). God's help came and Madina offered him to be their leader. 

The Muslims had to fight many wars with the Arab unbelievers who had oppressed them. The large amounts of money that came through warfare was given in charity by the prophet. A man who had denied authority before denied the usage of money and as the prophet’s wife said: ‘We used to see three crescents in two months, and no fire used to be made in the houses of Allah's Apostle. Urwah said, ‘What used to sustain you?’ Aisha said, ‘dates and water, except that Allah's Apostle had neighbors they used to give the Prophet some milk, and he used to give us from it to drink’ (Muslim no. 5282). Umar (Rta) cried seeing this state of the prophet and said 'O Allah's Apostle! …though you are Allah's Apostle you are living in destitute’. The Prophet replied. 'Won't you be satisfied that they enjoy this world and we the Hereafter?’ (Bukhari 60:435).  

Whenever someone wronged Muhammad (P) he always forgave him. He only punished people when they violated the state laws or when they harmed other people. As his wife said: He (the prophet) never took revenge for himself concerning any matter that was presented to him (Bukhari 81:777).

Many people tried to kill him and he was even able to get the sword of a man who came to kill him but he still forgave him (source: Bukhari 59:458), he forgave the unbeliever who had pushed his daughter and she had had a miscarriage, how many of us can do the same? Just 3-4 years before his death a Jewish woman brought poisoned sheep for the prophet to eat. His (P) palate showed ill effects. The companions wanted to kill the woman but the prophet forbade them (source: Bukhari 47:786). 

A certain prisoner of war was a vigorous orator and used to speak openly against the prophet, some companions proposed that his teeth be broken but the prophet said 'If I get his teeth broken God shall break My teeth, even though I am a Prophet! (Ibn Hisham as quoted in Maududi's Tafhim-ul-Quran Vol.5 p.14). And when he (P) finally conquered Makkah, all those who had killed or oppressed the Muslims and the prophet, thought they would be put to death. The prophet said, ‘This is the day of mercy’ ‘You are safe, you are free.’ Peace be upon the merciful apostle of Allah.

Muhammad (P) brought a great revolution in the whole world and turned the Arab Bedouins, who were an ignorant and savage nation, into the most civilized nation humanity ever new. Muhammad emphasized on acquiring knowledge and thinking deeply about God’s creation. He abolished poverty, maintained justice and he was the first prophet to completely abolish the concept of slavery, gradually. 

Slaves were acquired during wars, thus (after a certain time)  the Muslims were forbidden enslaving anyone in wars and were left with only 2 choices i.e. they would let all the captives go free with or without some ransom. They had no other choice, God said: ‘tie fast the bonds (make captives) then set them free, either by grace or ransom, till the war lays down its loads (Quran47:4). Finally it was also revealed ‘Those of your slaves who seek freedom, contract with them accordingly (Quran 24:33). The prophet said: ‘And one should not say, my slave, or my slave-girl, but one should say my lad, my lass' (Bukhari 46: 728).  

In his ‘last sermon,’ emphasizing on human equality, he said ‘All mankind is from Adam and Eve, Arabs and non-Arabs, whites or blacks have no superiority over one another except by piety or good action’ Abolishing the concept of revenge-killings, he said ‘Verily your blood, your properties are sacred and inviolable. Annulled are the blood-revenges of the Days of Ignorance (Muslim no. 2803). He said 'Whoso slays any human being unless it be a person guilty of man-slaughter or of spreading disorders in the land, shall be as if he had slain mankind altogether; And whoso gives life to a soul, shall be as if he has given life to mankind altogether (Quran 5:32). 

When the prophet and his companions fought those who had oppressed them, he forbade everyone to harm any innocent person: ‘God does not forbid you from being just and kind to those who do not fight you. God forbids you to making friends, Only those who fight you for (your) Faith, and drive you out of your homes’ (Quran 60:8-9) And ‘The way (to fight or punish) is Only open against those who do wrong to the people, and are insolent in the earth wrongfully. But he who BEARS patiently and is forgiving surely that is true constancy'(Quran 42:42-43).  

Muhammad (P) taught and displayed through his character doing good even to enemies! He taught that we make enemies our friends, rather our Intimate friends: ‘Goodness and Evil can never be equal. Repel Evil with what is better or good. Then will he between whom and you was enmity become as he were your intimate friend (Quran 41:34)’

Muhammad (P) being such a great man was yet so humble, different from the ‘mighty men’ of today who’s anger and rudeness, is their pride. Lives of great men are not easy; Muhammad (P) suffered so much, yet never complained to God. No male child of the prophet ever survived and Ibrahim his son whom he loved with all his heart left him at the age of 15* months. ‘My eyes weep, my heart is in grief but from my tongue I shall say words which God likes,’ were the words of the prophet. Based on his teachings the Muslims were able to make great educational, religious and social contributions to the world in the past (which led to the Renaissance and Reformation in the west as well). Following the prophet can make us change the world, discover new things and make our status in the world better. 

Abdur Rahman

A PTI Businessman Paid 3 Crore 95 Lac Tax! 94% OF The Amount Of Tax Paid By All the National Assembly  Parliamentarians Combined!

                 

With CIRP's (Umar Cheema) report coming this year; we got to know how much taxes our politicians do (or don't) pay.

Jahangir Tareen (PTI) was shown to be the highest  tax paying politician of Pakistan (2011) and Aitazaz Ahsan (PPP) stood on second place.

Now comes the news of a certain businessman in Karachi named Najeeb Haroon. Najeeb Haroon has a "construction business" in Karachi. He is known to be a very honest and noble person. He paid a total of Rs. 3,95,00,000 Tax which is 94% of all the taxes paid by the Parliamentarians of National Assembly!

According to CIRP a total of Rs. 4,25,00,000 tax was paid by the entire National Assembly while this single business man in Karachi totally outclassed them! Kudos to him!

The Pakistan Tahreek-e-Insaf should be proud to have such honest members like Najeeb (who holds the position of Vice President at City Level).

Najeeb puts to shame those "Businessmen Politicians" whose actual income and assets are much greater than they show. And who, thus pay much smaller amount of taxes.





-From The Article Published in the Daily Jang on 2nd January 2013 ( http://e.jang.com.pk/01-02-2013/pindi/pic.asp?picname=629.gif  also http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-19944-Businessman-pays-94pc-of-what-all-MNAs-paid-in-tax)

Shahbaz, Nawaz Sharif Or Imran Khan-Who And Who Not to Vote?

Shahbaz, Nawaz Sharif Or Imran Khan-Who And Who Not to Vote?

I am a supporter of PTI/Imran Khan. I used to support PML-N/Nawaz Sharif,Shahbaz Sharif until the previous elections. But I am going to vote for PTI in these elections. And I am ready to change my mind if anybody shows me how any other party is superior or any leader as honest as Imran Khan.

Strangely enough, even Imran Khan's opponents have this argument "against" his honesty; "O! Imran khan is not the only honest person..."

The most common argument presented against his party is that he is allowing dishonest and old politicians to join in, even though he talks of "change." And when the other party leaders are asked about them allowing the same people into their parties, the reply usually is: "But we were not claiming the change-Imran Khan was." Which in other words is saying, "oh we know we are all a bunch of dishonest crooks! but you claimed to get an honest team-talk about yourself!!"

Thus the other parties actually acknowledge Imran Khan's honesty and their dishonesty. But the question of Imran Khan allowing "bad" people into his party is still the "hot favourite."

Coming to this question of the "bad" people arriving in PTI.  Well, we all want a party which has all 'honest' and 'nice' people. Though in my opnion the PTI does not have all the people which I would consider as "nice and honest," however there are a lot of them which I do consider as great and honest individuals. But I can't think of a way Imran Khan could have stopped the new comers from joining his party, when they claimed to have given up their previous thoughts, and to then believe in PTI's agenda and yes; "to have declared their assets!"

But the most important thing is that PTI is going to have party elections and thus no one can get any party seat of himself. Also no one can get the party ticket unless PTI's 'parliamentary board' decides. Thus I believe the party will naturally have a good "clean-up,"-and this has already begun with many PML-Q new comers, who have left PTI and re-united with the PML-Q.

People talk about Shahbaz Sharif's good works as CM, and Nawaz Sharif's good works as PM, as well as of Imran Khan's philanthropy and charity work. So should it be Imran Khan we should be keeping in mind before voting for PTI or should it be Shahbaz Sharif/Nawaz Sharif before voting for PML-N?

But then, didn't the Chaudhry brothers do a lot of great works in their rule? The 1122 ambulance service, free primary education, free school books for children, are a few examples. And then didn't Musharraf do great works too? So how should one decide who to vote?

We have witnessed that people rejected PML-Q and Musharraf for their wrong doings and ignored their good works, in the previous elections. These leaders were "half-good, half-bad!" -as some people say. The question arises again; are we going to vote for another "half-good, half bad" leader?

My opinion would be that we should judge, the available leaders, as a WHOLE and not try to compromise with their "bad qualities (the one's which effect the nation)."

Shahbaz Sharif has done some good work in Punjab. His support for young students, his action against some of the dacoits (though partial) is commendable. But there is also too much mismanagement, misjudgement and a very "dictatorish" attitude in some of the things he does.

People talk of PML-N's laptop scheme, the danish schools, the roads etc. without realising the fact that you don't spend money for "decorations" in a house where people have nothing to eat! People of punjab are poor, and are deprived of education and books. How can any man of intellect think about wasting money on mega projects (like danish schools) when you can make thousands of schools for the poor with the same money? Do you buy an Expensive Music system for a house first or build its roof?

And although we all seem to fall for some of the excellent roads in lahore (thanks to Shahbaz sharif and Nawaz sharif) and for the spectacular motorway, and even I, at some point in time was too excited about the motorway and roads being made in lahore. Just like a middle class man would fall for an expensive decoration piece in the mart even though he has little money to spend on his children's education-and then we have the angry (but sensible) wife scolding him as to why he wasted his money on that decoration piece, when they had little money to buy grocery!

Now, almost every scheme that the PML-N starts goes into corruption and losses; just like the "sasti roti" scheme of Shahbaz Sharif. Interestingly, this scheme was inspired by Imran Khan's "Sasta Tandoors." Imran Khan put up tandoors for providing cheap roti to the poor, but they never went into losses or any corruption. That is because the main leader ship was not corrupt. But anyway the scheme by Shahbaz sharif was a good effort on his part.

Other than that the PML-N leaders are involved in corruption and they never declare all of their assets. Some of their leaders are involved in 'violent' activities in regions of South Punjab. Also they have a very violent approach to solving issues. An example is the recent crack down against doctors. They attacked the doctors' and medical student hostels and arrested them. Some of them were tortured. They spent so much money for publishsing adds against them in every newspaper and on every news channel. Why such a waste of money and that too for giving false information about the pays of doctors? Any one can cross-check PML-N adds that were published in news papers with the pays being paid in reality, and he would know that it was all a big fat lie! How can we vote for such a violent government who wastes so much money for spreading lies, but they are not ready to raise the health budget?!!

Imran Khan has Shaukat Khanum, Namal university and a lot of charity works to his name. Recently his foundation (Imran Khan Foundation) built 376 houses for the flood affectees of Rahim yar Khan (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOkT8TnIG4s) , 309 homes in Rajan Pur (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in3AMvt3eNQ&), restored over 240,000 acres worth of farmland by providing free seed to the farmers all over Pakistan (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Otp8EE0SuSs&). And also his work for the Sindh flood relief and his humanitarian assistance initiative in Badin are great examples. None of these works ever went into corruption or losses. And another important thing is that he did all this when he is not in any government.

Some people also falsely criticise Imran Khan that he doesnot speak against terrorists and against sectarian and minority opression in Pakistan. But the truth is that Imran Khan has condemned the terrorists and terror acts more than any other leader. And he is the only leader who constantly visits the victims of terrorism! He visits the Opressed Shia Muslim communities, he visited the Ahmadis in hospitals and he visited the Hindu communities in Sindh.

He has spoken against Shia Muslim killings (specifically against lashkhare jhangvi too examples: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_Q0iLVOY2s , http://tribune.com.pk/story/401434/stop-targeting-hazaras-imran/,http://tribune.com.pk/story/430252/cj-should-take-notice-of-shia-killings-imran-khan/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvUQg8Bis64&), against Hindu opression (he went to the extent of saying that he felt shameful being a Pakistani on their killing, he condemned forced conversions too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZJ19MG3hnA& -at 1:24-1:55 min.), against Ahmadi killings (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gQFI2uuw9Q&, also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_Q0iLVOY2s at 44th minute ). He spoke against the arrest of the Christian girl on blasphemy charges
(https://www.facebook.com/PTIOfficial/posts/435104169864568).

He condemned the Taliban calling them anti-islam, anti-human and barbaric, alongwith condeming beheadings and school burnings multiple times(see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_Q0iLVOY2s). He also said that he would disarm ALL militant groups and condemned going into Afghan jihad, and said that the militant groups stood on 'hate' (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7IQ2SONvi8&).  He does, however, say he can't be too outspoken against any 'specific' militant group as this would be akin to asking them to attack him (he said this in an interview to Saleem Safi on Geo News).

Now some people would ask why have I not analysed the PPP in this article? The reason is simple. It is because I believe that this time, no sane individual is going to vote for them. Imran Khan calls the PPP leader "the biggest dacoit," in almost every press conference of his. And he need not say much. He knows the public hates that leader already. But there are a lot of sane individuals (including some of my friends) who might make a big mistake by voting for the PML-N.

In the end I dream of a future Pakistan; the house of that poor maid who works in our house, its very small and in a congested and dirty place, comes into my mind. They are very poor. Then there are my friends who want to leave this country "Pakistan me kuch nai rakha..Pakistan ka bura hal hone wala he bhag lo," they say. Then there are people, who live outside the country...who say they'll be back if Imran Khan comes to rule. Then there is the girl who fears death because she is a Shia Muslim in GB. There are Christians who now have started to dislike this country more than ever. Then there are the doctors who want to run away, there is no respect for us they say.

Imran Khan promises to change that; the poor have a chance of a better standard of life-that 'poor house' of our maid has some chance. Those Shia Muslims and those Christians, those Hindus and Ahmadis they have some chance of protection. The people who wanted to come back to Pakistan might be here. The thousands of those Pakistanis who want to invest here if Imran Khan is in power are going to pour in their money. Imran Khan's passion and zeal for Pakistan, his confidence with which he vows to root out the evil from here, are signs of a true leader who can really do what he says, if God wills!

Do we even have that "chance" with any other government? Do we have that "chance" with PML-N? Or PPP? They don't even promise, with any confidence, to do what Imran Khan claims to do. All we are going to hear with their government is "excuses" and more "excuses." "Oh Pakistan is in a crises its very difficult to bring things to normal"--will say Nawaz Sharif...'We are trying to control the anti-Shia violence but people are too violent! "The previous government has ruined this country we are trying to save it." New roads, a new motorway is in the making! More danish schools coming up your way! And may be, and I pray this never happens but we might as well have to hear "Pakistan Khappay!" again from you-know-who.